Voluntary childlessness and climate responsibility: Religious bioethics in the age of digital reproductive culture
1 Faculty of Social Theology and Religious Studies, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens.
2 Department of Greek Philology, Democritus University of Thrace, Greece.
Research Article
Open Access Research Journal of Science and Technology, 2026, 16(02), 106-121.
Article DOI: 10.53022/oarjst.2026.16.2.0035
Publication history:
Received on 09 February 2026; revised on 16 March 2026; accepted on 18 March 2026
Abstract:
The components determining a contemporary reproductive decision include demographic anxiety, climate responsibility, and the transformation of culture brought about by digital technology. Previously, voluntary childlessness, contraception, and birth control were mostly seen as aspects of personal freedom or religious beliefs. Now, they are intertwined with global sustainability discussions, the quest for identity in the online world, and the changes in the ways in which bioethics functions and is organized. The paper offers a comparative religious bioethical treatment of the theme of reproduction restriction in Judaism, Christianity, and Islam, and also sets the three religious traditions against the background of climate ethics and digital reproductive culture. This research is anchored in bioethical literature on procreation, infertility, and moral responsibility to consider how religious injunctions on fruitfulness, stewardship, and human dignity reflect their dialogue with the ecological crisis and demographic depression. The paper discusses the case of childlessness voluntarily chosen for reasons related to environmental concerns, the ethics of contraception in different denominations, and the impact of online childfree communities and reproductive discussions in digital space. By taking religious moral theology, environmental bioethics, and sociological studies of childfree identities as points of departure, the paper maintains that reproductive limitation is not an issue that can be resolved by simply referring to the rights of the individual. It rather requires considering sustainability, justice, and concern for future generations from a relational and ecological perspective. Apart from this, the work demonstrates how digital media alter the way in which reproduction is perceived at the moral level, thereby giving rise to new conflicts between religious normativity and the formation of personal identity.Lastly, the article suggests an ecological-relational bioethics model that could reconcile religious tradition with demographic and environmental changes of today.
Keywords:
Voluntary Childlessness; Religious Bioethics; Contraception Ethics; Climate Responsibility; Population Ethics; Digital Reproductive Culture; Environmental Theology; Reproductive Autonomy; Demographic Decline
Full text article in PDF:
Copyright information:
Copyright © 2026 Author(s) retain the copyright of this article. This article is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Liscense 4.0